A study of the effect of surfaces on oxygen atom recombination at low pressures Technical status report no. 1, May 1 - Oct. 31, 1967

Catalytic effects of materials surfaces on oxygen atom recombination at low pressure

Discriminating coastal rangeland production and improvements with computer aided techniques

The feasibility and utility of using satellite data and computer-aided remote sensing analysis techniques to conduct range inventories were tested. This pilot study was focused over a 250,000 acre site in Galveston and Brazoria Counties along the Texas Gulf Coast. Rectified enlarged aircraft color infrared photographs of this site were used as the ground truth base. The different land categories were identified, delineated, and measured. Multispectral scanner (MSS) bulk data from LANDSAT-1 was received and analyzed with the Image 100 pattern recognition system. Features of interest were delineated on the image console giving the number of picture elements classified; the picture elements were converted to acreages and the accuracy of the technique was evaluated by comparison with data base results for three test sites. The accuracies for computer aided classification of coastal marshes ranged from 89% to 96%

Multispectral scanner data processing over Sam Houston National Forest

The Edit 9 forest scene, a computer processing technique, and its capability to map timber types in the Sam Houston National Forest, are evaluated. Special efforts were made to evaluate existing computer processing techniques in mapping timber types using ERTS-1 and aircraft data, and to provide an opportunity to open up new research and development areas in forestry data

RadBench : benchmarking image interpretation skills

Purpose: The key aim of this research was to develop an objective, accurate assessment tool with which to provide regular measurement and monitoring of image interpretation performance. The tool was a specially developed software program (RadBench) by which to objectively measure image interpretation performance en masse and identify development needs. Method: Two test banks were generated (Test 1 & Test 2), each containing twenty appendicular musculoskeletal images, half were normal, half contained fractures. All images were double reported by radiologists and anonymised. A study (n ¼ 42) was carried out within one calendar month to test the method and analysis approach. The participants included general radiographers (34), reporting radiographers (3), radiologists (2) (all from one UK NHS Trust) and medical imaging academics (3). Results: The RadBench software generated calculations of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in addition to a decision making map for each respondent. Early findings highlighted a 5% mean difference between image banks, confirming that benchmarking must be related to a specific test. The benchmarking option within the software enabled the user to compare their score with the highest, lowest and mean score of others who had taken the same test. Reporting radiographers and radiologists all scored 95% or above accuracy in both tests. The general radiographer population scored between 60 and 95%. Conclusions: The evidence from this research indicates that the Radbench tool is capable of providing benchmark measures of image interpretation accuracy, with the potential for comparison across populations